Skip to Main Content. Please Contact Us if there is anything we can do to improve the Accessibility of this site.
  • Search:

Right menu

Left menu

Home / Complaints / Final Orders / Final Orders 2010 / FCHR Order No. 10-009

FCHR Order No. 10-009

Date of Release: 02/16/2010




EEOC Case No. 15D200900170




FCHR Case No. 2009-00414



DOAH Case No. 09-3098


FCHR Order No. 10-009




Preliminary Matters

Petitioner Robert A. Boody, III, filed a complaint of discrimination pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Sections 760.01 - 760.11, Florida Statutes (2007), alleging that Respondent Florida Highway Patrol committed unlawful employment practices on the basis of Petitioner’s disability by terminating Petitioner from employment and on the basis of retaliation by denying Petitioner’s request to participate in secondary employment while on administrative duty.

The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on April 30, 2009, the Executive Director issued his determination finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe that an unlawful employment practice had occurred.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice, and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.

An evidentiary hearing was held by video teleconference at sites in West Palm Beach and Tallahassee, Florida, on September 4, 2009, before Administrative Law Judge Claude B. Arrington.

Judge Arrington issued a Recommended Order of dismissal, dated November 23, 2009.

The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.

Findings of Fact

We find the Administrative Law Judge’s findings of fact to be supported by competent substantial evidence.

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s findings of fact.

FCHR Order No. 10-009

Page 2

Conclusions of Law

We find the Administrative Law Judge’s application of the law to the facts to result in a correct disposition of the matter.

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s conclusions of law.


Petitioner filed exceptions to the Recommended Order in a document entitled “Petitioner’s Exceptions to Proposed Findings of Facts & Conclusion of Law,” received by the Division of Administrative Hearings on December 8, 2009.

While the exceptions document was filed with the Division of Administrative Hearings instead of the Commission, the document was timely-filed, and, consequently, the Commission will consider the document even though it was filed in the wrong forum. Accord, Lane v. Terry Laboratories, Inc., FCHR Order No. 08-022 (April 14, 2008), and cases cited therein.

Petitioner’s exceptions document takes issue with Recommended Order paragraph numbers 12, 17, 18, 20, 29, 30, and 31.

Petitioner’s exceptions to Recommended Order paragraph numbers 12, 17, 18, 20, 29 and 31, take issue with inferences drawn by the Administrative Law Judge from the evidence presented.

In addition, Petitioner’s exceptions to Recommended Order paragraph numbers 30 and 31 take issue with the Administrative Law Judge’s ultimate finding that Petitioner was not discriminated against on the basis of his disability (Recommended Order, paragraph 30), and the ultimate finding that Petitioner was not unlawfully retaliated against by Respondent (Recommended Order, paragraph 31).

We note that it has been stated, “The ultimate question of the existence of discrimination is a question of fact.” Florida Department of Community Affairs v. Bryant, 586 So. 2d 1205, at 1209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Further, the Commission has stated, “It is well settled that it is the Administrative Law Judge’s function ‘to consider all of the evidence presented and reach ultimate conclusions of fact based on competent substantial evidence by resolving conflicts, judging the credibility of witnesses and drawing permissible inferences therefrom. If the evidence presented supports two inconsistent findings, it is the Administrative Law Judge’s role to decide between them.’ Beckton v. Department of Children and Family Services, 21 F.A.L.R. 1735, at 1736 (FCHR 1998), citing Maggio v. Martin Marietta Aerospace, 9 F.A.L.R. 2168, at 2171 (FCHR 1986).” Barr v. Columbia Ocala Regional Medical Center, 22 F.A.L.R. 1729, at 1730 (FCHR 1999). Accord, Bowles v. Jackson County Hospital Corporation, FCHR Order No. 05-135 (December 6, 2005).

Noting that we have found the facts contained in the Recommended Order to be supported by competent substantial evidence, Petitioner’s exceptions are rejected.

FCHR Order No. 10-009

Page 3


The Petition for Relief and Complaint of Discrimination are DISMISSED with prejudice.

The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right

to appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of February , 2010.


Commissioner Billy Whitefox Stall, Panel Chairperson;

Commissioner Lizzette Gamero (dissenting); and

Commissioner Patty Ball Thomas

Filed this 16th day of February , 2010,

in Tallahassee, Florida.


Violet Crawford, Clerk

Commission on Human Relations

2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 200

Tallahassee, FL 32301

(850) 488-7082


As your complaint was filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which is enforced by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), you have the right to request EEOC to review this Commission’s final agency action. To secure a “substantial weight review” by EEOC, you must request it in writing within 15 days of your receipt of this Order. Send your request to Miami District Office (EEOC), One Biscayne Tower, 2 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2700, 27th Floor, Miami, FL 33131.

FCHR Order No. 10-009

Page 4

Copies furnished to:

Robert A. Boody, III

c/o Cathleen Scott, Esq.

Cathleen Scott, P.A.

Jupiter Gardens

250 South Central Boulevard, Suite 104-A

Jupiter, FL 33458

Florida Highway Patrol

c/o Sandra Coulter, Esq.

Neil Kirkman Building

2900 Apalachee Parkway, A432

Tallahassee, FL 32399-0504

Claude B. Arrington, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH

James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed to the above listed addressees this 16th day of February , 2010.

By: _____________________________

Clerk of the Commission

Florida Commission on Human Relations